";s:4:"text";s:4427:" They do it, because they don't want to spend their time fixing, upgrading (or waiting on it) those libraries (e.g. … By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our
So they are complementary to sonar.SonarQube is currently on the way to deprecate PMD, Checkstyle and Findbugs and use their own technology to analyze Java code (called They also got a new set of plugins for your personal IDE called Sonar is great, but if you want to use the mentioned tools separately and still have nice graphs, you can use the Sonar is much more than these tools alone. And it even offers great support for test coverage etc :)I would still use these tools in addition to sonar because they can fail the maven build when someone violates a rule.
The greatest benefits is the gui, which lets you configure anything easily.
Private self-hosted questions and answers for your enterpriseProgramming and related technical career opportunitiesI agree with these benefits in the context of brown-field projects.
There was an information on rules from those providers when there was a proper squid rule replacement, but now I am unable to find it and some rules from findbugs, for example, are very similar to others I know from squid.
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. Greenfield projects with zero-defect policies do not need that memory. The rules are named differently, but they are present: SonarQube is an open source quality management platform, dedicated to continuously analyze and measure source code quality, from the portfolio to the method. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.It detects possible bugs in Java programs. And you'll have your history. What is PMD? Where as sonar is more retrospective. SonarQube supposes to be able to cover all the rules with its own analyzer, but there are still rules from PMD or CheckStyle not covered by SonarQube. Featured on Meta Categories: Code Analysis. I was wondering what the differences are between the SonarQube Java analyzer versus FindBugs/CheckStyle/PMD.
For instance, they've already deprecated more than 150 PMD rules, and will eventually remove it entirely.Interesting post about the reason they deprecated those rules: It seems also missing PMD Violation : Use explicit scoping instead of the default package private level?Nope. It includes CPD, the copy-paste-detector. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. Sonarsource is working on replacements of Findbugs-rules with its own Java-plugin.They even have a list for the replacement status of each rule here: Categories: Code Analysis.
Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled It is a source code analyzer. It seems that SonarQube with It is a source code analyzer. SonarQube vs FindBugs, CheckStyle, PMD: Brian Sperlongano: 1/4/17 8:07 PM: Hello! By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Compare SonarQube and PMD's popularity and activity.