If not, I'll just buy another WD Red instead of having to buy two Ironwolves. Posted by 1 year ago. But not always, and even if they are a bit more, might be with the premium due to longer warranty, better performance, and positive long term studies. had 2 failures in about 2 years. They've run like champs for well over a year. This seems completely expectedThere are two IronWolf product lines, the regular IronWolfs (5900 RPM) and the Pros (7200 RPM).Yes no issues so far, I have them running 24-7 and they go into hibernation when not in use.Is it under 2TB? the seagates runs hotter (as they are 7200 rot) than the WD Not the "pro" model of either. BackBlaze posts reliability information about various models they purchase, and they buy a lot more than us! Had Seagate placed a consumer NAS drive on the market sooner then the data may be skewed in their favor. Also happened to me with Seagate drives a while back.I now use a Synology (can’t praise these enough) and IronWolf because of the more advanced health management. To prevent this, the drives have an automatically changing rotation speed … Archived. Zero failures in about 6 mos - 2.5 years depending on the model. Was just curious if 2x WD Reds (5400rpm) would offer less performance than 2x Ironwolves. We continue to push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition.
My DS218+ just arrived, slightly earlier than I expected, so now I need to purchase some hard drives. That's pretty much all i've been buying lately is hgst. Sign up
90% of my data drives are now, and all will soon be, 8TB Seagate Archives v1 and v2. I tell them to get bent and that the fact they shipped me the wrong drive is their problem.Two days later they say fine and ship me the right drive without a second hold on my credit card (LOL).All the while, replies from them have taken 1-2 days. I think you'll be fine with either option and you shouldn't stress about it too much. I would reccomend Ironwolf for three reason: The Red Series is old and slow compared to Ironwolf. Has anyone compared the two? It's a RED or very similar (some might argue slightly better, some might say a little worse) for 8 and 10TB size and the price difference is huge (something like $150 vs $230 for 8TB and $180 vs $300 for 10TB).What capacity are you looking for and are you looking at pro or non-pro? After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives … If you want to use our website in its full glory, you need to accept our cookies. Ironwolf is cheaper (at least in my country) Is there a strong recommendation for one or the other? I personally have WD Reds and Golds in my Synology units, but I'll probably look to try IronWolf/ IW Pros in the future.Do you have a list of the failures per capacity?
Noticed pricing for each is about the same, more or less. Seagate's IronWolf and IronWolf Pro NAS drives are all certified SMR-free. All that said, my main box uses the very excellent Seagate Ironwolf drives. If you're looking at the IronWolf Pro, then they're all 7200 RPM, RV sensors come standard, and they have more robust workload ratings & warranty.I'd say Seagate, but that's 'cause I've had tons of issues with WD over my 21+ years doing IT work. Why are people switching to AMD?
Lots of people 'round these parts got burned by a 1.5TB (and I think there was a 2 or 3TB model) that had issues, and as a result, started bleating far and wide about how Seagate is the Devil incarnate, and WD is the Angel that will save all of your data / never ever fail. Differences Between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. Click the button below and set a password via email to log in. Scored myself 9 10TB Ironwolfs (1 spare just in case).I'm currently in the process of RMA'ing my 3rd drive due to disk sector errors.Hey OP, first off, we wanted to say thanks for considering Seagate, regardless of which route you decide is best for your needs in the end!
Clash of the NAS Drives: WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf vs Toshiba N300.