";s:4:"text";s:3941:" This gives voltages, temps, and fans. If I could find out the PCI Device/Register where this data is held I could probably implement this fairly easily (Probably not on Linux tho, as I don't regularly use it).For Linux, this Issue was one of the Search-Results i had meant: The MSR Addition from hirschmann looks not so bad, but i dont have a Linux with GUI available right now :-(I found a fork of kraust's work with a branch that covers the ITE IT8665 - this gives another piece of the puzzle but is still WIP -> This gives voltages, temps, and fans.
For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. It seems like the person who made the fork doesn't intend to merge his changes back into this project (regardless of whether or not this repo is actually active or not). I cannot help at all and would like to see all information available on my setup....Hello again. CPU. I've found HWinfo or CoreTemp to be the MOST accurate with the broadest range of chipsets and sensors.
PSU : EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2.
- not sure it's possible to bake this into the superio area however and we may need to wait for the BKDG in order to update the AMD10 code. I would suggest you use HWiNFO as its really the only modern reliable hardware monitor out there.It isnt that bad and far from a Problem to get further with OHM!For only "using" there are enough options!
CPU temp varies by CPU too. Here is a CPUz report and a CoreTemp register dump instead attached.woot can't wait for support love this program for monitoring my computer.A pull request was never made to notify people that these changes were made. Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory $76.59 Storage Question What Is The Best CPU Temp Monitor for my Ryzen 7 1700: CPUs: 12: May 11, 2020: Question Dual monitor with Ryzen 5 2400g: CPUs: 1: Jan 9, 2020: X: Question Ryzen 5 3600 temps not showing in MSI Afterburner: CPUs: 1: Dec 26, 2019: L: Question display no signal after Ryzen 5 2700x to Ryzen 7 3900x upgrade: CPUs: 8: Dec 14, 2019
Personally, unlike you are ONLY worried about CPU core temps, which is very accurate in Core Temp on nearly all chipsets, I prefer HWinfo. They are also almost religiously kept up to date.^ Wow, thanks. Very informative as far as programs to try. There is an option in the settings section of Core Temp to not place an icon in the taskbar I believe. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5 GHz Quad-Core Processor $84.99 Motherboard.
And just for the record, I can view lots of data with LMSensors (Voltages, Temperatures, Fan Speeds), I don't see why this shouldn't be possible with this software.Go back to Issues (List), type into the Searchbox: "Linux" and you will get the posts about it!I didnt say, that it is impossible... Afaik, there is no one working on Linux Support, atm!OT: I was looking into this issue again this weekend, and I still haven't found the PCI Device/Register where temperatures are located.
*I also don't appreciate when a developer steals my work verbatim without any notification (SuperIO Additions). You must log in or register to reply here.
HWmonitor, Open hardware monitor, Realtemp, CPU-Z and most of the bundled motherboard utilities are not terribly accurate. The most I could bring with settings this time was 72, but mostly running in the 60's along with the GPU during the hard bench. As predicted..sitting here doing much of nothing and I see 33C, up to 44C "surfing". CPU temp I think needs some conditional code adding somewhere based on cpu type because it appears to include the offset (or part of!) My Specs are: CPU : Ryzen 7 3700x. There is a lot more information in HWinfo than there is in Core Temp. Is this normal?