a:5:{s:8:"template";s:8969:" {{ keyword }}
{{ text }}
";s:4:"text";s:11311:"I could go either way, despite owning a Lund (vintage). Enjoy whatever you get. Tillers are great because of the extra room you get and are nice for precise boat control but can be miserable in really nasty weather. It's like anything that's popular weather it be boats or clothes - you pay for the name. I've had the same situation in May on more than one occasion Wayne. I fish a good bit by myself out of a 16.5 foot tiller and like the control and open floor space they offer but I am thinking of going a little larger. Tonnes of room in this boat for everything, easy to troll with the riggers when alone , no looking over your shoulder all day , in a 16' your gonna be looking for all the space you can ! YOU really have to check the boats out, sit in them, pretend your fishing, and see what works, and what doesn't, then weight the pros/cons of each. BUILD. Not too sure how many keel strips on the Princecraft or the Aluma craft, but I will find out. By Both are top quality, however, Alumacraft does not have the marketing machine or the sponsorship that Lund has, therefore more Lunds out there and a higher price. My next boat will be an Alumacraft Navigator 165 or 175. First off..... TILLER and ALUMACRAFT. Link to post Share on other sites. "Why, yes Reverend Jones, I am a little parched. Tiller vs console is a very personal choice as only you know what your comfort level, season and fishing needs are on the water. As mentioned a few times previously in this post, when your fishing big water in November & December and the winds are howling and the snow is blowing, it's great to have the full encloser to keep you warm, dry and comfy. I am also a fair weather type, so rigging for winter, or extreme weather is not as important to me as it would be to the hardcore types. Lund boats tend to run 20% to 30% more than their competitors. . The question I have is, does one of these boats handle rough water better than the other? I do a ton of Muskie fishing and a lil bit of everything else. a full windshield would just take up too much room. I couldn't imagine the ride with a tiller. Lund has 3 14-footers (A-14, WC-14, and SSV-14) whereas I think Alumacraft only has one in that size category. Lund puts their boats on Shoreland'r trailers with the Lund name on them. I'd take another look at the pro V bass, It's a pretty sweet boat. Navy Jr . Riptide Terrova 80 Trolling Motor w/i-Pilot & Bluetooth, Marine Electrical Panels JavaScript is disabled. I will never own a full console boat theres so much wasted space IMO. . Breakers, Boston Whaler, 1972-1993, I have a 4 years old LUND and love it. In regards to Lund vs Alumacraft, you cant go wrong either way. You are using an out of date browser. The third dealer I never met. Both seems well made boat but the shape of the haul are different so we wonder if one rides better than the other. We went to the boat show and we both like the Princecraft 186 and the Lund Crossover 1875 or Tyee 1800. April 9, 2011. mamona Started Wednesday at 02:24 PM, Ontario Fishing Community This makes the Lund Pro-V $7,000.00 more expensive than the Tracker Targa. I love backtrolling for walleye and love the open space for muskies. My personal favorite after all the boats I've owned is a full windshield with a standup, fully enclosed top. A while back I read they were going to be taken private again by an investment group and one of the group is from the original family. A 19’ Tracker Targa will start out at a price of only $36,000.00. At the end of the day, you will not be making a mistake either way, just find a boat layout that will meet your,and your passengers, criteria. Alumacraft is owned by Corinthian Capital Group LLC, a private equity firm. Lund vs Smokercraft Boats: How Do They Stack Up? I'd love to have both, but was happy to take the tiller. I agree w/ Raf too, if you're going 16' there's not enough space for a console. I fished last year into December, spent some time on two of Ontario's Great Lakes, chased everything fishy that swims, got wet a couple times because of having a tiller, but it never once really bothered me. I don't own a tiller ones to big, ones to fast, and the other I need to sit up front so I can see the rocks before I hit them. Why wouldn’t Lowe be considered a competitor? Pro-V Musky. Not everyday you go out and the weather is perfect. The second dealer I have known for years and he alway seem like he has a bug up his butt, if you know what I mean. I didn't make it to the boat show so to be honest I haven't looked at these boats close enough. Now if you go with the Alumacraft, you have the option of different power sources which may be a deciding factor for you. Lund and Alumacraft are both solid boats. The extra room and the quick response of the tiller is great as well. One I don't like because he never returned my calls or emails and when I did speak to me he started selling me a stainless prop and all the bells and whisles I don't want. I'm still, hands down, a tiller guy. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Protects from nasty cold and wet weather and those baking hot sunny days. March 23, 2011 in General Discussion. We are looking at the above mentioned makes. I have a Lund and like it, but it is a matter of personal choice. Both are equally as fast, stable and handle great. I've got an Alumacraft Navigator 165 (full windshield), thanks Gord. Alumacraft is also a very popular choice within this segment as is Crestliner, a brand noted for its all-welded construction. The only difference and big difference is the price. I like a boat with a windshield and a top. I am favouring Lund. I got on crestliner and lunds website last night to build my boat. The Lund Pro-V Limited is a premium professional fishing boat loaded with innovation—limited graphics package, custom black console windshield frames, Pro-Ride seats, marine floor mats, custom trailer and much more. Lund has an excellent reputation in this regard and is part of the reason why it was number one on our list. I think 16.5ft is in our price range. All rights reserved. Slightly off topic, but does anyone have an opinion on the larger Alumacraft, Creslliner , or Lund Tillers (18-20 foot)? Dang.. we had it in August Dan @ zero C! Minn Kota Full windshields give the most protection when running down the lake but unless you have a bigger boat your movements are also somewhat limited. Rainsuit and/or goggles came out a couple times. Lund and Crestliner boats are both part of the Brunswick Marine Group. That would be my choice. Crestliner & Alumacraft are more typical comparisons to Lund. I fish with family and friends, so the full windshield is great for everyones comfort. See the picture below. You see people out on their boats having loads of fun. For example, a 19’ Pro-V will start out at $43,000.00. 2075 XS. IMO once you go 17-18'+ the extra length affords you the luxury of going console. Sign up for a new account in our community. Not sure if it affects speed alot since Tiller is much light. Tracker only has 3 keel strips & no splash rails, Lund has 5 keel strips & splash rails, Naden has 5 keel strips. I love tillers but with a young boy and a wife that is uncomfortable on the water I went with a full walk through I got a lund rebel 1825 xl sport have a look at the 1625 I sat in that boat and it is very nice takes up to a 75hp and is affordable. ), You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Plus, I think I just wanted a Lund having always really liked my buddies 16 foot Classic tiller. Not an Etec vs. all other motors. My passengers do not like the fact that I blast around everywhere because I am shielded while they are frozen and wind blasted (I remain unsympathetic). It is my boat during a trip to Rice last spring. Once I wieght the pros/cons, it always comes out ahead. Possibly looking to buy a brand new package. Wiser's boat is an AWESOME RIG! Lund Tyee vs. Alumacraft Trophy GUESTS. Spend your money wisely. Yaa but look at how cool you look standing up in the back of the boat with a tiller in your hand. Lund 14' new is $2600.00, Tracker is $2000.00. Shop . This one could be interesting. Alumacraft is the industry leader in deep-v, aluminum, multi-species fishing boats. Im open to any brand alumacraft, sylvan was just wanting some pros/cons. Are the rides any different? 1875 XS. If fishing the GL's more often, then an 18 foot with a console would have been the choice, but the Lund handled BOQ well this year when picking the right days, same as the Ottawa River... and I got in and out of some smaller lakes with shallow launches unscathed as well. Lund vs. Crestliner? Copyright © 2019 IBOATS. About the boats themselves, the Alumacraft was heavier and required a larger and heavier motor, but the weight appeared to be invested in a true double-bottom hull versus only a forward section double hull on the Lund, a plus for Alumacraft. Man just pop a Marlboro Cigarette in your mouth and unzip your jacket so it can flutter in the breeze.... and your the bomb. Lowe, Crestliner, Lund or Alumacraft I'm seriously looking at buying a vhull boat which is what I have now. dintymoore Started Wednesday at 02:12 AM, By Has anyone ever owned this boat. I thought they are no longer owned by Brunswick. Money wise this boat is $12,400 compaired to the Lund 1625 Classic with the same equipment is $16,000. 16 foot is the workable size for big and small water. I haven't seen either boat close up, just in brochures. I'm a little more partial to Lund though, as our family cabin is on the lake they test all their boats on. I am willing to sacrifice creature comforts for fishability. This boat is coming to the grave with me, but there are a couple times a year, where a full windshield/console would have been nice. I have a tiller. By So I guess I will go with the Alumacraft 165 Classic CS. you guys who complain about cold/wet/hot/sunny weather shouldn't be fisherman. Lund is too expensive of a boat and not really better of a boat. Both are top quality, however, Alumacraft does not have the marketing machine or the sponsorship that Lund has, therefore more Lunds out there and a higher price. I dont like Kool-Aid, more of an Iced Tea guy, Tiller...cuz I don't need a training wheel (just kiddin! If … The hard reverse chine gets the hull on plane quickly, bow 2075. I've been reading the threads on these two boats and I like them both. Single & dual consols are great for running WOT down the lake on a cold moring but somewhat cut down on your space if you have a smaller boat and are also uncomfortable on those miserable cold rainy days. The Alumacraft would have been a little less money, but the dealer wanted to put it on a trailer I didn't care for. Rebel is a great stable boat. Their rod storage, bait/livewells and ergo's seem to be built FOR fisherman BY fisherman...unlike everyone elses. One thing to note, if you get a Lund, you get a Mercury 75, either Optimax or 4 Stroke, no other motor options since Mercury and Lund are both Brunswick owned companies with a strong contractual bind. ";s:7:"keyword";s:27:"osteoporosis word breakdown";s:5:"links";s:958:"Steve Moore Drummer Facebook, Alvarez Ap70 Vs Ap66, White Kelso Fighting Style, Last Breath Sans Phase 3 Id, Total Number Of Registered Nurses In The Philippines, Japanese Food Habits, Eternity Flooring Provincial Collection, Beretta Cx4 Storm Aftermarket Stock, ";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}